If privacy is increasing for My Health Record data, it should apply to all medical records?

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]The laws underpinning the My Health Record as well as records kept by GPs and private hospitals currently allow those records to be shared with the police, Centrelink, the Tax Office and other government departments if it’s “reasonably necessary” for a criminal investigation or to protect tax revenue.

If passed, the policy of the Digital Health Agency (which runs the My Health Record) not to release information without a court order will become law. This would mean the My Health Record has greater privacy protections in this respect than other medical records, which doesn’t make much sense.

Changing the law to increase privacy

Under the proposed new bill, state and federal government departments and agencies would have to apply for a court order to obtain information stored in the My Health Record.

The court would need to be satisfied that sharing the information is “reasonably necessary”, and that there is no other effective way for the person requesting it to access the information. The court would also need to weigh up whether the disclosure would “unreasonably interfere” with the person’s privacy.

If granted, a court order to release the information would require the Digital Health Agency to provide information from a person’s My Health Record without the person’s consent, and even if they objected.

If a warrant is issued for a person’s health records, the police can sift through them as they look for relevant information. They could uncover personally sensitive material that is not relevant to the current proceedings. Since the My Health Record allows the collection of information across health providers, there could be an increased risk of non-relevant information being disclosed.

But what about our other medical records?

Although we share all sorts of personal information online, we like to think of our medical records as sacrosanct. But the law underpinning My Health Record came from the wording of the Commonwealth Privacy Act 1988, which applies to all medical records held by GPs, specialists and private hospitals.

Under the Act, doctors don’t need to see a warrant before they’re allowed to share health information with enforcement agencies. The Privacy Act principles mean doctors only need a “reasonable belief” that sharing the information is “reasonably necessary” for the enforcement activity.

Although public hospital records do not fall under the Privacy Act, they are covered by state laws that have similar provisions. In Victoria, for instance, the Health Records Act 2001 permits disclosure if the record holder “reasonably believes” that the disclosure is “reasonably necessary” for a law enforcement function and it would not be a breach of confidence.

In practice, health care providers are trained on the utmost importance of protecting the patient’s privacy. Their systems of registration and accreditation mean they must follow a professional code of ethical conduct that includes observing confidentiality and privacy.

Although the law doesn’t require it, it is considered good practice for health professionals to insist on seeing a warrant before disclosing a patient’s health records.

In a 2014 case, the federal court considered whether a psychiatrist had breached the privacy of his patient. The psychiatrist had given some of his patient’s records to Queensland police in response to a warrant. The court said the existence of a warrant was evidence the doctor had acted appropriately.

In a 2015 case, it was decided a doctor had interfered with a patient’s privacy when disclosing the patient’s health information to police. In this case, there no was warrant and no formal criminal investigation.

Unfortunately, there are recent examples of medical records being shared with government departments in worrying ways. In Australia, it has been alleged the immigration department tried, for political reasons, to obtain access to the medical records of people held in immigration detention.

In the UK, thousands of patient records were shared with the Home Office to trace immigration offenders. As a result, it was feared some people would become too frightened to seek medical care for themselves and children.

We can’t change the fact different laws at state and federal level apply to our paper and electronic medical records stored in different locations. But we can try to change these laws to be consistent in protecting our privacy.

If it’s so important to change the My Health Records Act to ensure our records can only be “unlocked” by a court order, the same should apply to the Privacy Act as well as state-based laws. Doing so might help to address public concerns about privacy and the My Health Record, and further inform decisions about opting out or staying in the system.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_zigzag][vc_column_text]

Authors

[/vc_column_text][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/2″][vc_column_text]
Research Fellow in Law, University of Melbourne

Professor of Speech Pathology, University of Technology Sydney[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/2″][vc_column_text]
Associate professor, University of Melbourne

Director, University of Newcastle Legal Centre, University of Newcastle[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

This article originally appeared on theconversation.com.

[/vc_column_text][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/4″][vc_single_image image=”2387″ img_size=”full”][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”3/4″][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Is the CV relevant today?

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]When I asked our HR Business Partner why I was interviewing this candidate, I was told to ‘just wait until you meet her’. Fifteen minutes into the interview, I knew why. She just had it. And by had it, I mean she had the innate leadership talent we look for, despite her lack of relevant experience. We hired her and never looked back.

I’ve been telling this story quite frequently over the past few weeks after Stryker was named #2 on the Great Places to Work list; our third year in the top two. I’ve been asked what the secret to this success is.

For Stryker, the foundation of our people strategy is how we recruit. Hiring is the single most important decision a manager can make. Get it right and it pays back in spades. Get it wrong and you pay for it for years to come. This isn’t rocket science and I would think most organisations buy into this approach. The hard part is living it day in, day out. To help us, we focus on 3 key areas:

  • Our hiring philosophy is centred around hiring for talent and not for experience. Therefore, when we recruit we look for the things you can’t teach an individual. When you take this philosophy into your hiring process, you automatically widen your potential pool of candidates. In addition, it also opens you up to finding people that are better suited to the role.
  • Our method has been based on a long-term partnership with the Gallup organisation studying exceptional performance in roles and what makes the best the best. For example, we study what the best people managers do and know that unless you inherently care about your team and want to see people develop then you’re likely to not succeed.
  • Lastly, while we may have a strong talent philosophy and method, it takes a huge amount of organisational discipline to stick to it. If you set your talent bar high, recruiting takes time and it should be hard.

So, does our formula mean the CV is dead? Absolutely! The CV is dead as the key and major driver for a successful application at Stryker. Talent is our key focus, so apply and bring your whole person to the interview.

By using a talent philosophy, developing a method to identify it and then sticking to it in an uncompromising fashion, you open the organisation up to the possibility of:

  • Avnish, a former Physiotherapist now a Robotics Product Specialist
  • Tim, a former Park Ranger now leading a team that builds Operating Theatres
  • Sarah, formerly in the Fashion Industry, now a HR Co-ordinator
  • And myself, a former Youth Worker now running Stryker for Australia and New Zealand.

[/vc_column_text][vc_zigzag][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column width=”1/4″][vc_single_image image=”2403″ img_size=”full”][/vc_column][vc_column width=”3/4″][vc_column_text]

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Maurice Ben-Mayor is the President of Stryker South Pacific.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_separator color=”white”][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Women in MedTech Leadership

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Stryker is one of the world’s leading medical technology company and together with its customers, is driven to make healthcare better. Stryker offers innovative products and services in Orthopaedics, Medical and Surgical, and Neurotechnology and Spine that help to improve patient and hospital outcomes.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Fully Funded MRI Licences

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]The Government and the Opposition in recent times have been making a series of announcements regarding where new MRI licences would be made available.

The Opposition got the ball rolling when in May it announced that in government it would provide for 20 new licences, 10 for public hospitals and 10 for private hospitals.

Last weekend, the Government upped the ante by announcing they would fund an additional 30 MRI licences with Minister for Health, Greg Hunt, naming the first ten localities to receive them from November this year.  This also follows on from the review Minister Hunt ordered into how MRI licences are allocated.

Up until recently, there had been a total of 5 new MRI licences since 2013, and 2 of them were announced during the election campaign.

The flurry of activity by both the Opposition and the Government can be traced back to the Senate inquiry into diagnostic imaging that reported in February of this year.

By putting the issue of MRI licences in the political and public spotlight, it was only a matter of time before both major parties started making the commitments they have.

It is also testament to the power and influence that a Senate inquiry can have in that in 5 years only 5 new licences were made available, but in the space of 5 months since the inquiry, access to 50 new licences have been announced.

The other telling point is that health remains and will be a front and centre political issue between now and the federal election.

Both sides are competing for votes and know health can be a deciding factor in how many people decide to vote.  Access to MRIs has shown itself to be the latest battleground in the ongoing health debate.

While Labor and the Government seek to outdo each other on announcing new MRI licences, the big winner is patients.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging is amazing medical device technology, and the more people that can have access to it when needed, can only be good for the community as a whole.[/vc_column_text][vc_zigzag][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column width=”1/4″][vc_single_image image=”1915″][/vc_column][vc_column width=”3/4″][vc_column_text]

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Jody Fassina is the Managing Director of Insight Strategy and has been an strategic adviser to MedTech and pharmaceutical stakeholders.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

J&J ON THE HILL

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]J&J’s goal is to help key decision-makers better understand the company’s business and advance policy discussions around the healthcare landscape.

This year’s event coincided with debate around important reform to the Private Health Insurance sector that will impact on everyday Australian’s with health insurance.

J&J said it was pleased to have met with stakeholders from all sides of politics to advance the company’s arguments on how better to protect consumers and ensure the sustainability and values of Private Health Insurance moving forward.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

FACT SHEET – ATRIAL FIBRILLATION

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

What is atrial fibrillation and how common is it?

Atrial Fibrillation (also known as AF) is a prevalent and dangerous arrhythmia problem that affects almost half a million Australians. (AF) is a heart condition whereby the top chambers of your heart (the atria) beat fast and erratically. In Atrial Fibrillation, your heart may not pump blood around the body as well as it should. If left untreated, AF may lead to serious health complications, such as stroke and heart failure.

Why is AF a problem if it’s left untreated?

In people with atrial fibrillation, blood may become trapped in the heart chambers and cause a clot. This blood clot can then travel to the brain, blocking the blood supply to the brain and causing a stroke.

People with atrial fibrillation are five-to-seven times more likely to suffer a stroke, and three times more likely to develop heart failure. For this reason, early diagnosis and appropriate treatment are essential. There are a number of treatment options available to help manage symptoms and lower your risk of heart failure and stroke. Many people with atrial fibrillation have no symptoms, but others experience a racing heart, thumping in the chest, chest pain or discomfort, fatigue, tiredness, loss of breath, or dizziness.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

What is happening during Atrial Fibrillation Awareness Week?

As part of AF Awareness Week, hearts4heart is setting up testing stations in hospitals, PG Clinics and pharmacies across the nation for free testing for Atrial Fibrillation. This is a wonderful opportunity for people to have comprehensive screening for AF in addition to assessing their risk of developing AF. However, we encourage Australians, particularly for those over the age of 65 to visit their GP for regular screening for AF to reduce the risk of stroke. We encourage all Australians to visit one of our sites providing free screening during AF Awareness Week to reduce your risk of Stroke. You can visit the Hearts4Hearts website at hearts4heart.org.au for a full list of locations.

Why is it so important to be screened for AF?

30% of people living with AF are undiagnosed and are at risk of stroke. For people living with atrial fibrillation, the risk of stroke is 5-6 times greater than the general population and up to 80% of these strokes are preventable.

What final message do you have for the community to coincide with Atrial Fibrillation Awareness week?

While AF can affect anyone at any age, the risks increase as you get older.  The most common causes of atrial fibrillation are abnormalities or damage to the structure of the heart over time because of a heart attack or long-term high blood pressure, heart disease, diabetes, sleep apnoea or obesity. Managing lifestyle factors such as limiting alcohol intake, stopping smoking, managing a healthy diet and regular physical activity can significantly reduce the risk of developing AF.

Finally, we also encourage Australians and in particular medical professionals to visit the Heart Foundations’ website for the new Australian AF Clinical Guidelines recently launched at the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand annual conference.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

APPLE’S ANNOUNCEMENT GETS HEARTS RACING

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]The much-anticipated new additions to the iPhone family were quickly overshadowed by Apple’s fourth generation Watch, aptly named Series 4. An already established leader in technology wearables, the new Apple Watch Series 4 has accelerated Apple’s long march into the health and wellness space with the announcements of its new capabilities.

Speaking at the Special Event, Apple’s Chief Operating Officer, Jeff Williams, described the new Apple Watch as an intelligent guardian for your health.

Williams highlighted a number of key features including the watch’s improved accelerometer and gyroscope which can detect when a user is falling and call emergency services if required.

“Fall detection is a feature that we hope you never need but it’s really nice to know it’s there” Mr Williams said.

As reported in Wired Magazine, “the feature that received the most applause was the electrocardiogram (ECG) using the new ECG app”.

Partnering with cardiologist and President of the American Heart Association, Ivor Benjamin, Apple was able to introduce an industry-first consumer wearable that boasts the built-in ECG.  Through the new ECG app, users can opt to receive a heart rhythm classification within 30 seconds and a notification if an irregular heart rhythm is detected.

Users can export the data captured by the watch’s electrical heart rate sensor into a PDF report to be shared with health professionals for further analysis.

As consumer data continues to dominate the conversation around health in the United States and Australia, Apple’s latest achievement will likely herald a further shirt toward patient-centred care.

While the Apple Watch’s ECG capable app has been given the tick of approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the same technology will not be available in Australia as the device is yet to have approval from the TGA.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

METECH18 LESS THAN 50 DAYS AWAY

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]The two-day conference is split into four themes:

  • The power of Politics
  • Let’s talk Patients front and centre
  • Innovation gets Personal
  • Public Perception gets real

One of the big issues to be discussed will be the challenges of regulating software as a medical device. We’ve just seen last week Apple launch the next generation Apple Watch that has FDA approved electrocardiogram (ECG) app, capable of tracking and recording electrical signals from your heart in 30 seconds. Unfortunately, this will not be available in the Australian model due to not having TGA approval.

Given the barrier to entry for these apps is so low how does industry and regulators ensure the quality of the technology can be directly linked to clinical evidence sufficient to demonstrate an appropriate level of safety and performance when used for the intended purpose? Timothy Plante Assistant Professor, Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont has claimed this area of digital health apps is no better than “snake oil”.

 Another issue that will be a focus of discussion on day two will be the innovation of medical technology through physician collaboration. Invention that is wholly original certainly takes place, but often in medical technology the innovation is incremental, modifying, upgrading, or improving existing devices.

Physicians as the primary users of medical technology which means much of the feedback that spurs the creation of the next generation of innovative products comes from physicians who share with manufacturers their real-world experience.

One of those speaking on this issue is Professor Hala Zreiqat who was earlier in the year announced as the 2018 NSW Women of the Year. The award recognises NSW women who have excelled in their chosen career, field or passion and Professor Zreigat is a perfect example of Australia’s multicultural success story.

 Hala Zreiqat grew up, studied and worked in Jordan before moving to Sydney to do a PhD in Medical Sciences – a decision that transformed her life.

Today she is recognised internationally for her extraordinary contributions to regenerative medicine and translational orthopaedic research.

She’s Professor of Biomedical Engineering at the University of Sydney, where she founded the Tissue Engineering and Biomaterials Research Unit in 2006. Pioneering the invention of new biomaterials and biomedical devices, the unit’s work is giving NSW a place at the table in the highly competitive global orthopaedic market.

Described as a trailblazer in championing opportunities for women, Hala was the first female president of the Australian and New Zealand Orthopaedic Research Society. A Senior Research Fellow of the National Health and Medical Research Council for the last 10 years, she was also the first person in NSW to receive a prestigious Radcliffe Fellowship from Harvard University.

She was recently involved with Allegra Orthopaedics successful application for Commonwealth funding through the BioMedTech Horizons program. The project seeks to commercialise a fully synthetic spinal cage which works by regenerating bone under spinal load conditions and be completely resorbed by the body, leaving it and the intervertebral space free of foreign materials – making it a one-of-a-kind innovation. The device is 3D-printed from a synthetic bone bioceramic (Sr-HT-Gahnite) invented at The University of Sydney.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

A VISION FOR A NEW APPROACH TO HEALTH

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]The CSIRO Future of Health report provides a list of recommendations for improving the health of Australians over the next 15 years, focussed around five central themes: empowering people, addressing health inequity, unlocking the value of digitised data, supporting integrated and precision health solutions, and integrating with a global sector.

CSIRO Chief Executive Dr Larry Marshall said collaboration and coordination were key to securing the health of current and future generations in Australia, and across the globe.

“It’s hard to find an Australian who hasn’t personally benefitted from something we created, including some world-first health innovations like atomic absorption spectroscopy for diagnostics; greyscale imaging for ultrasound, the flu vaccine (Relenza); the Hendra vaccine protecting both people and animals; even the world’s first extended-wear contact lenses,” DR Mashall said.

“As the world is changing faster than ever before, we’re looking to get ahead of these changes by bringing together Team Australia’s world-class expertise, from all sectors, and the life experiences of all Australians to set a bold direction towards a brighter future.”

The report highlighted that despite ranking among the healthiest people in the world. Australians spent an average of 11 year in ill health – the highest among OECD countries.

Clinical care was reported to influence only 20 per cent of a person’s life expectancy and quality of life, with the remaining 80 per cent relying on external factors such as behaviour, social and economic support, and the physical environment.

“As pressure on our healthcare system increases, costs escalate, and healthy choices compete with busier lives, a new approach is needed to ensure the health and wellbeing of Australians,” CSIRO Director of Health & Biosecurity Dr Rob Grenfell said.

The report stated that the cost of managing mental health related illness to be $60 billion annually, with a further $5 billion being spent on managing costs associated with obesity.

Health inequities across a range of social, economic, and cultural measurers were found to costs Australia almost $230 billion a year.

“Unless we shift our approach to healthcare, a rising population and increases in chronic illnesses such as obesity and mental illness, will add further strain to them system,” Dr Grenfell said.

“By shifting to a system focussed on proactive health management and prevention, we have an exciting opportunity to provide quality healthcare that leaves no-one behind.

“How Australia navigates this shift over the next 15 years will significantly impact the health of the population and the success of Australian healthcare organisations both domestically and abroad.”

CSIRO has been continuing to grow its expertise within the health domain and is focussed on research that will help Australians live healthier, longer lives.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]